“Slide to Unlock” (US 8046721)
Breakdown of Claim 1 of the patent:
The first claim begins by formally defining the
functionality and procedure of sliding to unlock. The claim explains that
sliding to unlock is a method to unlock an electronic device to begin entry
into the applications and features of the device. This method includes
detecting contact to the screen on a specific starting location and sliding to
a specific destination location without removing contact. To detect contact a
certain type of pressure and contact will be required for the user to exert.
Specifically, the claim states that the starting predefined
location will display some sort of visual cue to direct the use towards the
predefined destination. Ultimately the device will go from a state of locked or
inaccessible to unlocked or accessible after moving the designated symbol from
the start location to the destination.
Patent Litigation related to the Slide to Unlock Patent
between Apple v Samsung.
Apple argues that Samsung’s phones violate their Slide to Unlock
patent, which is described in the previous blog. They show that the Samsung
phones similarly gain contact with the device and slide on the screen to unlock
the device.
One may think why to bother over such a trivial matter such
as unlocking a phone. However, Apple claims to have formulated this slide to
unlock feature through almost two years of research and development. They
stated that it was the most optimal way to prevent accidental unlocks while
keeping the unlocking process enjoyable for the user.
Apple not only sued Samsung from their headquarters in
California, but also the Samsung branch in London. When they sued in Europe, their efforts were
to no avail, as the judges did not agree that Apple was the original inventor
of the slide to unlock feature. In California there seemed to be a bit more
favoring towards Apple as it was agreed that Apple did have the patent for and
invent the slide to unlock feature.
Samsung showed that they had a similar feature, but it was not violating
the slide to unlock patent as they could slide anywhere and had different
options in unlocking the phone.
In May of 2014, Apple was awarded $119.6 million in damages
due to Samsung’s infringement on their patents, but not the Slide to unlock
patent. As for the slide to unlock patent, the U.S. court ruled that the Samsung's infringement was not willful.
No comments:
Post a Comment